Divine Hiddenness: If a loving God existed, would God ensure we know it (to foster relationship)?

“No, after all…
  • Some would just immediately reject relationship

      Some resistant non-theists, upon coming to belief, would immediately reject loving relationship. This article analyzes two evidences,...
      • …many testify that they'd resist
      • …many historical examples exist
      This is relevant because God's specified motivation to ensure x would believe is to allow for relationship, and that motivation is lost insofar as God knows that x would immediately reject relationship even with belief.1

      But so what?
      • …God would reveal Himself to haters anyways.
      • …God wouldn't have created a world with people who would resist.[Forthcoming]

      1. After all, “even the demons believe” (James 2:19), and God ostensibly has no interest in securing from persons mere mental assent of His existence.
        >• Paul Moser (Philosophy professor at Loyola Chicago): “This means that God wants us to love God and thus to treasure God, not just to believe that God exists (see Deuteronomy 6:5; Mark 12:30; James 2:19). The Hebraic God wants all people to enter lovingly into God’s life, in action as well as thought. So production of mere reasonable belief that God exists does not meet God’s higher aim for humans. For our own good, God is after something more profound and more transforming than simple reasonable belief. As all-loving, God will not settle for anything less.” [“Divine Hiddenness Does Not Justify Atheism” (eds) M. L. Peterson, R. J. Vanarragon Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Blackwell, 2004), 44.]
        Robert T. Lehe (Philosophy professor at North Central College): “Given the complicated psychology of the process of moving toward religious commitment, it is by no means obvious that the most effective way for God to move a person to desire conversion involves the shortest possible path to belief that God exists.” [“A Response to the Argument from the Reasonableness of Nonbelief,” Faith and Philosophy 21(2) (2004): 163.]
        Travis Dumsday (Philosophy professor at Concordia): “…it is worth recalling something that all parties to the debate grant, namely that God’s aim is supposed to be that of enabling us to have a positive relationship with Him. His aim is not merely to convince us of His reality, but to allow for such a relationship.” [“Divine hiddenness and creaturely resentment” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (2012): 43.]
  • Some would just have an improper relationship (evil)

  • Some would just abandon the relationship later in life

  • Greater goods of relationship obtain with divine silence

  • Total, greater goods obtain with divine silence

  • God can have relationship with some during their disbelief

      God can have relationship with someone just fine even while the person is a non-theist. [Full article.]. This is relevant because the reason God allegedly would prove his existence is in order to allow for relationship—that reason would be gone.

      But so what?
      • …belief is required for a relationship that is deep and reciprocal.1

      1. One thing to note here is that the pros and cons of divine hiddenness are often weighed against each other. Even if it is granted that a non-theist cannot have a deep reciprocal relationship with God while disbelieving (which is not necessarily granted), it can radically affect the equation. No longer is relationship being sacrificed, but rather just a temporary depth of relationship, and that is far easier to outweigh for the sake of other goods than permanently and entirley cutting off the opportunity for relationship.
  • “Yes, after all…
  • Greatest love seeks relationship first (like a mother)

      The greatest kind of love is Earthly/motherly love.1(Forthcoming) This is relevant because, >• J.L. Schellenberg: “The possibility of some form of personal interaction with the parent will (insofar as she is able to ensure it) always be there. What loving parent would ever willingly allow this possibility to be taken completely away? Parental love will not permit this to occur when it can be prevented.” [“What the Hiddenness of God Reveals,” Divine Hiddenness: New Essays (Cambridge, 2002), 24.]

      1. J.L. Schellenberg: “In examining [the] concept [of God's perfect love], [we must] develop our understanding of it … by reference to what is best in human love. [“Does Divine Hiddenness Justify Atheism” in M. L. Peterson & R. J. Van Arragon (Eds.), Contemporary debates in the philosophy of religion (Blackwell, 2004), 39.]
        J.L. Schellenberg: “…reflection on the concept of divine love shows that a perfectly loving God would necessarily seek personal relationship with all individuals [who are not resistant] … [because] the seeking of personal relationship is an essential part of the best human love …[Therefore] Something similar must apply to God’s love for us. [“Divine Hiddenness Justifies Atheism” in (Ed.) M. Read, Evil and the Hiddenness of God (Cengage, 2015) 69.]