Were Cleopas and his companion testifying that Jesus appeared to them on the road to Emmaus?

“Yes, after all…
  • The account is not ultimately a lie/legend

      The Jesus-appearance to Cleopas (& his Emmaus escort) reported in Lk 24 was no one’s invention (meaning it was no lie, nor literary creation, nor legend of Luke’s or Luke’s sources)..

      On this page we can debate these 4 evidences:
      It is unappealing as an invented lie/legend.
      Luke confirmed the account with Cleopas.
      Jesus-bio witnesses controlled self-rumors.

      This is relevant if, given it also didn’t originate by accident, the only option left is that it originated as an honest eyewitness recounting. And of course an honest recounting could’ve only realistically originated with Cleopas and/or his companion reciting what they remember. (Rather than Cleopas’s companion, it was likely Cleopas himself that was Luke’s source. After all Luke was a Greco-Roman biography, and these conventionally cite witness sources via special inclusion of their names in the reported episode.)

  • In general, Luke relays witness testimony

      In general, the author of Luke inherited his Jesus-biography from relevant witnesses.

      On a forthcoming page we can debate these 5 evidences:
      • Lk traveled and spoke with witnesses.
      • Lk knew the oral reports/details.
      • Eyewitness oral traditions were not elusive.
      • Most biographers preferred using witnesses.
      • Lk was in contact with the witnesses.

      This is relevant because it suggests that in this specific case, Luke again is relaying relevant witness testimony: that of Cleopas and his companion.

  • In AD 30, the Jerusalem church said so
  • In general, the traditional witnesses say “Jesus visited us!”
  • “No, after all…
    • .

      On this page we can debate these 4 evidences:
      .
      .
      .
      .

      This is relevant because

  • SHOW/HIDE MENU