Did the AD 30 Jerusalem church accurately represent what the relevantly involved witnesses of Jesus were saying?

“Yes, after all…
  • AD 30 Jerusalem was poised to know Jesus-bio

  • 1st church rejected Jesus-bio not vetted by witnesses

      The Jerusalem church strive to reject Jesus-bio not approved (vetted) by involved witnesses. A full page will debates 5 evidences:
      • In AD 30, 1st church strove to adopt only witnesses' Jesus-bio.
      • Christians strove to protect true Jesus-bio.
      • 1st church was the nexus of witness knowledge.
      This is relevant IF the Jerusalem church was continually circulating the message that Jesus appeared to various persons.

      But so what? Plausibly...
      • The Jerusalem church wasn't saying Jesus appeared to witnesses (forthcoming)