If Jesus was God’s sinless envoy and died, would God have reason to soon resurrect him from death?
-
Our question
Is Jesus someone whom God would plausibly raise from the dead soon after his execution? If you heard a guy say that his random and uninteresting next door neighbor levitated, flew in circles, and spit fire while morphing into a banana, you would be skeptical. And simply saying, “Well, God did this to him,” likely would not help much. Why? Because it strikes us as very unlikely a priori that an all-good and all-knowing God would choose to do such an pointless thing. So even if there is a God, there are things God obviously is unlikely to do, and these are things for which we'd require extreme evidence. That is to say, even assuming God exists and Jesus is a real historical figure, why think this miracle of raising Jesus is any less random? Look around; it’s a fact that God just does not raise people from death, just like he does not morph people into bananas. What sense is there to it? Consequently, why not judge the idea of God choosing to spontaneously raise Jesus in the middle of human history as so hopelessly absurd that no realistic evidence would ever be able to compensate for it?
-
Resources
See Oxford philosopher Richard Swinburne's The Resurrection of God Incarnate (Oxford, 2003). He covers this question in depth and concludes that becoming incarnate and resurrecting is a kind of thing God might plausibly do if God existed.
-
God could vindicate Jesus+Gospel via resurrection
God could simultaneously vindicate both Jesus and the Gospel Jesus preached through raising Jesus and seeing to it that Jesus appeared to the apostles
This full page, analyzes 4 arguments:
- Jesus taught “death won’t hold the sinless”, and God's raising Jesus would simultaneously demonstrate Jesus's sinlessness and the authority of Jesus's message.
- The Bible says "God gives all/only the sinless eternal life.”, and so again God's raising Jesus would show Jesus to be sinless and authoritative.
- Seeing Jesus’ new-body vindicates resurrection’s desirability, insofar as some in the Greco-Roman world were skeptical of the goodness (i.e. desirability) of returning to life in bodily form.
- God’s unmediated raising Jesus is a highest-level Divine mark of favor, which is why God's raising a false prophet would make no sense. Raising Jesus constitutes a stamp of approval on both Jesus and his teachings about sin, himself, and the world.
This helps suggest that God would have reason to raise Jesus from death, because we stipulated that Jesus was God's sinless envoy, and before Jesus's death he had just been preaching the so-called “bad news” (for us) of God's impending judgement on sinners for their sins, and the “good news” (for us) of one way God will offer forgiveness and cleansing to the repentant (i.e. the “Gospel”). God would plausibly want to vindicate Jesus and this gospel to core evangelists so they could spread it through evangelism. (There are philosophical/theological reasons for why God would want the Gospel to spread this way.)
-
OT says: God will resurrect his people for good
The Old Testament both explicitly and implicitly teaches that God plans on raising all his righteous remnant (Israel) to eternal life.
This full page analyzes 7 arguments:
- E.g. It is taught in Job, Psalms, Hosea (earliest OT writings).
- E.g. It is taught in Daniel 12:2.
- E.g. It is taught in Isaiah 25:8 & 26:19.
- In Genesis, humans face ultimate death if and only if they were sinners. It is only natural then that if humanity is returned to a sinless state, that ultimate death would no longer be a problem for them. And if one man was in a sinless state, ultimate death (i.e. dying and staying dead) would arguably not make sense for him either.
- The OT says the messiah will be resurrected, and there is good reason to believe Jesus is the prophesied Messiah.
- Jews expected it, and their expectation is not random but well-justified.
- The OT affirms God’s omnipotence and omnibenevolence, and these properties together can rationally lead us to anticipate that God would preserve the righteous even if God permits them to die at first, restoring his creation back to life later.
This is relevant because, as theologians often point out, God made Jesus an ideal "type" of Israel (which we will argue for on another page). This means Jesus both recapitulates and foreshadows Israel's journey and succeeds as a faithful servant in ways old covenant Israel failed. (And this isn't some odd and surprising observation, God has had good reason to make Jesus a type of Israel.)
-
Death was designed just for sinners
God wants the sinless to live forever. His purpose for death (cursing humanity with it) is to limit/punish sinners, but ultimate/irreversable death serves no purpose for the righteous.
This full page analyzes 2 arguments:
- God would resurrect sinless persons for the same reason he created them in the first place. God intends to fill the world with his image-age bearers, and if God would restore them then ultimate death was not intended as their ultimate destination.
- Biblically, God does resurrect sinless persons, and this fits well on the hypothesis that final (unreversed) death was simply not intended to apply to those who are righteous.
This is relevant because Jesus was sinless.
-
Dead people have always stayed dead
All throughout human history people have been dying, and these dead people always stay dead. This is relevant because if God lacked sufficient reason to raise virtually everyone else from death, we can assume (by extrapolative inference) that God almost certainly would lack sufficient reason to raise Jesus from death. It is obviously not the kind of thing he chooses to do.
But no…
- People testify to moden miraculous resurrections.
- Biblically, God has raised several people from death.
So? Plausibly…
- God has special reason(s) to uniquely raise Jesus soon after his death. (See all three reasons given by green above which uniquely apply to Jesus.)
-
If God were to raise Jesus, it'd be to show ALL Earth
If God really would raise Jesus from the dead, then God would have also followed through with things and ensured that Jesus appear to everyone or in a more comprehensive way.
This full page analyze 3 arguments:
This is relevant because instead only a few (at best) saw the allegedly risen Jesus.