If Jesus was God’s sinless envoy and died, would God have reason to soon resurrect him from death?

• God could vindicate Jesus+Gospel via resurrection

  

  God could simultaneously vindicate both Jesus and the Gospel Jesus preached by both raising Jesus and seeing to it that Jesus appeared to the apostles.

  This page analyzes 4 arguments:

  • Jesus taught “death won’t hold the sinless”, and God's raising Jesus would simultaneously demonstrate Jesus's sinlessness and the authority of Jesus's message.
  • The Bible says "God gives all/only the sinless eternal life.”, and so again God's raising Jesus would show Jesus to be sinless and authoritative.
  • Seeing Jesus’ glorified body proves the desirability of our being resurrected, insofar many in Greco-Roman society were skeptical that returning to life in bodily form was a desirable thing.
  • God’s unmediated raising Jesus is a highest-level Divine mark of favor, which is why God's raising a false prophet would make no sense. Raising Jesus constitutes a stamp of approval on both Jesus and his teachings about sin, himself, and the world.

  This helps suggest that God would have reason to raise Jesus from death because we stipulated that Jesus was God's sinless envoy, and before Jesus's death he had just been preaching the so-called “bad news” (for us) of God's impending judgment on sinners for their sins, and the “good news” (for us) of one way God will offer forgiveness and cleansing to the repentant (i.e. the “Gospel”). God would plausibly want to vindicate Jesus and this gospel to core evangelists so they could spread it through evangelism. (There are philosophical/theological reasons for why God would want the Gospel to spread this way.)

• OT says: God will resurrect his people for good

  

  The Old Testament both explicitly and implicitly teaches that God plans on raising all his righteous remnant (Israel) to eternal life.

  This page analyzes 7 arguments:

  • E.g. It is taught in Job, Psalms, Hosea (earliest OT writings).
  • E.g. It is taught in Daniel 12:2.
  • E.g. It is taught in Isaiah 25:8 & 26:19.
  • In Genesis, humans face ultimate death if and only if they were sinners. It is only natural then that if humanity is returned to a sinless state, that ultimate death would no longer be a problem for them. And if one man was in a sinless state, ultimate death (i.e. dying and staying dead) would arguably not make sense for him either.
  • The OT says the messiah will be resurrected, and there is good reason to believe Jesus is the prophesied Messiah.
  • Jews expected it, and their expectation is not random but well-justified.
  • The OT affirms God’s omnipotence and omnibenevolence, and these properties together can rationally lead us to anticipate that God would preserve the righteous even if God permits them to die at first, restoring his creation back to life later.

  This is relevant because, as theologians often point out, God made Jesus an ideal "type" of Israel (which we will argue for on another page). This means Jesus both recapitulates and foreshadows Israel's journey and succeeds as a faithful servant in ways old covenant Israel failed. (And this isn't some odd and surprising observation, God has had good reason to make Jesus a type of Israel.)

• The irreversibility of death was designed just for sinners

  

  God wants the sinless to live forever, and so plausibly (and reportedly) set up righteous humanity originally to either be invincible or to regenerate when facing any fatal circumstances. His purpose for introducing irreversible death (plausibly and reportedly [Genesis 3:19]) is to limit and punish wicked sinners.

  This full page analyzes 2 reasons to agree:

  • Biblically, God does resurrect sinless persons, and this fits well on the hypothesis that final (unreversed) death was simply not intended to apply to those who are righteous.
  • God would resurrect sinless persons for the same reason he created them in the first place. God intends to fill the world with his image- bearers doing image-bearing kinds of things (as stewards), and if God would preserve/restore them in fatal circumstances, then ultimate death was not intended as their ultimate destination.

  This purpose of ultimate/irreversible death (for sinners) factors into the discussion because Jesus was sinless (we stipulated). That means death as an irreversible/final state would hold no relevance for him. If humanity was originally immune to death (e.g. through natural regeneration), then this is how we might expect Jesus to be in virtue of his sinlessness.

• Dead people have always stayed dead

  

  All throughout human history people have been dying, and these dead people always stay dead. This is relevant because if God lacked sufficient reason to raise virtually everyone else from death, we can assume (by extrapolative inference) that God almost certainly would lack sufficient reason to raise Jesus from death. It is obviously not the kind of thing he chooses to do.

  But no…

  • People testify to modern miraculous resurrections.
  • Biblically, God has raised several people from death.

  So? Plausibly…

  • God has special reasons to uniquely raise Jesus soon after his death. (See all three reasons given by green above which uniquely apply to Jesus.)

• If God were to raise Jesus, it'd be to show ALL Earth

  

  If God really would raise Jesus from the dead, then God would have also followed through with things and ensured that Jesus appear to everyone or in a more comprehensive way.

  This page analyzes 3 arguments:

  • God wills for all to enter into a relationship with him.
  • God wills for all to believe Christianity is true.
  • God wills for all to believe Christianity via resurrection evidence.

  This is relevant because instead only a few (at best) saw the allegedly risen Jesus.