An essay for the journey
A Quick 4-Step Case for Christianity
Did you know that there is a pretty conservative case for the core message of Christianity that can convince people of its truth, even if they are very skeptical of the Bible? All you need are the basic methods of logic, science, and history, and a willingness to examine the New Testament letters as purely historical documents the way historians do.
In a nutshell, the truth of Christianity stands or falls on the resurrection of Jesus. So without assuming Biblical inerrancy, we can make a quick and compelling case for Christianity by asking the four big questions that lead up to belief that God raised Jesus from death:
(#1) DOES GOD EXIST?
• Argument #2: The Universe is fine-tuned
Of all the known ways the universe's physical laws, constants, and initial conditions could have been, few ways would ever allow life of any kind to exist. For example, if the cosmological constant were off by 1 part in 10 to the 120th power, the universe would expand too rapidly (only ever allowing hydrogen and helium) or it would collapse in a picosecond. So:
**Geoff Brumfiel **(Nature Magazine's Washington Correspondent): “If you believe the equations of the world’s leading cosmologists, the probability that the universe would turn out this way [life-permitting] by chance are infinitesimal — one in a very large number.” [“Our Universe: Outrageous Fortune,” Nature, Vol 439:10-12 (Jan. 5, 2006)]
The life-permitting nature of this fine-tuned universe makes perfect sense if God exists, but is very surprising and awkward for atheists, as many of them admit.
• Argument #3 There are moral facts:
Moral facts are facts. If the Nazis won and took over the world, the Holocaust would still be evil (even though everyone alive may agree it was good). It is just as if everyone started saying 2+2=9; they would be wrong. But what grounds moral facts? Philosophers have long said that if there is no God, then the answer is, “nothing”. Ever-changing evolutionary feelings adapted for this stage of human survival obviously can't ground objective moral facts (e.g. that love is good, murder is wrong). So when we see people (including atheists) doing loving and honest things, what allows us to all agree they are objectively good? The best explanation: God’s changeless nature is the standard of changeless moral values, and the more personal, honest, and loving something is, the more God-like and therefore good/valuable it is. But then what are our moral duties? Answer: God’s natural commands (“do not lie, do not murder”) flow from his goodness, and ground our objective moral duties. There is no other feasible explanation on the market for objective moral values and duties. Old Testament prophets and Jesus all teach we will be judged on the basis of God's moral law and commands when we die.
(#2) DID JESUS WALK THE EARTH?
(#3) WOULD GOD RESURRECT JESUS?
- First, historians recognize the genre of the Gospel reports as Greco-Roman biographies of Jesus, meaning the texts claim to be directly or indirectly grounded in witness testimony. Historians don't read the New Testament as "holy scripture." Whether the miracles are embellishments or not, these biographies of Jesus reveal his shockingly radical love and service for others, often in ways that were embarrassing in that time. Recall Jesus's caring for the culture’s most downtrodden: women, Gentiles, Samaritans, and tax collectors. It's not behavior anyone would want to invent or apply to Jesus, who is supposed to be Israel's prophesied King. It truly seemed like Jesus was out of this world. In conjunction with Jesus's message to humanity, the reports of Jesus's living sinlessly fits well if he truly were God's son and envoy.
- Second, Jesus fulfilled the many Old Testament prophecies about the coming King-Savior of the world (e.g., see Isaiah 53).
- Third, Jesus gave a grand Divine message worth vindicating, if true. It was that God’s judgment of all humanity is coming, and that those who freely follow Him and accept the moral transformation He offers to them will not perish, but have eternal life with God; i.e. God's righteous people will be resurrected to eternal life while the rest of the non-compliant world will be destroyed. The world will thereby be perfected; all that remains are God and those freely joining His project of maximizing the "good". If you believe in God, then there are philosophical arguments outside scripture which would lead one to expect such an all-good being to carry out a plan like this.
- Fourth, to this day, Jesus is the centerpiece of human history, penetrating every country on the globe, down to remote villages. His impact on culture, empires, art, music, literature, architecture, human relations, charity, medicine, education, holidays, etc. is unparalleled. In conjunction with the other coincidences surrounding Jesus, this influence arguably defies chance.
- Fifth, Jesus’s followers were convinced Jesus performed miracles in His own name (i.e. on His own authority) right before their eyes, and they recorded how Jesus, amidst His culture-defying love, claimed to actually be God in the flesh. This is an historical fact.
(#4) DID JESUS RISE?
Antony Flew (Lecturer at Oxford, arguably Christianity's greatest critic in his day): “The evidence for the resurrection is better than for claimed miracles in any other religion. It's outstandingly different in quality and quantity.”
One of the strongest pieces of evidence is that even atheist historians today can agree that Jesus died on the cross and yet soonafter the apostles honestly believed that they saw Jesus appear to them before their eyes. Any historian can look at how the experience transformed them and know the alleged witnesses at least weren’t lying. So:
Gary Habermas (Professor at Liberty) “On the state of Resurrection studies today, I recently completed an overview of more than 1,400 sources on the resurrection of Jesus published since 1975. I studied and cataloged about 650 of these texts in English, German, and French. Some of the results of this study are certainly intriguing. For example, perhaps no fact is more widely recognized than that early Christian believers had real experiences that they thought were appearances of the risen Jesus. A critic may claim that what they saw were hallucinations or visions, but he does not deny that they actually experienced something.” [The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Kregel, 2004), 60.]
This is powerful because no skeptic of Jesus's resurrection has been able to give a plausible hypothesis of what the apostles actually experienced, if not Jesus Himself. Some skeptical historians suggested group hallucinations, but the sheer number and variety of witnesses defies modern medical case-books. Hallucinations are like dreams--they cannot be shared. The case for Jesus’s tomb being suddenly found empty is also very strong. See details at beliefmap.org/jesus/body/missing. While the case for the resurrection is not technically a "proof" (since proofs are limited to math, etc.), it is strong evidence; adept skeptical investigators have come out being compelled by it, ultimately believing that Jesus is God's chosen, and that He did resurrect Jesus.