Is the Gott-Li "self-creating" universe model correct?

  • Introduction

    Sean Carrol: “Gott and Li suggest that the universe could ‘create itself,' springing to life out of an endless loop of closed timelike curves. More colorfully, ‘an inflationary universe gives rise to baby universes, one of which turns out to be itself.” [“How Did the Universe Start?” in Discover: Online]

    Is Richard Gott and Li-Xin Li’s semi-classical beginningless model true, or at least plausible? As one goes backwards in time, could one get caught in a time loop, going infinitely backwards through the same events over and over again? Could the past trace back to an infinite time loop with no beginning?

    General Relativity (GR) allows for wormholes and even “closed timelike curves” (CTCs)—paths in spacetime that loops back on themselves, theoretically allowing an object or particle to return to its own past. Here’s how: a mouth of a traversable wormhole can circle back to the other mouth at a relativistic speed, creating a time dilation effect between them—a loophole time machine.

    There could be primordial self-creating loop? In “chaotic inflationary” models, inflating universes can give a birth to other inflating universes. Perhaps the mother universe could trace back to a primordial Planck era where Quantum Mechanics dominate. In this quantum foam era, topologies like closed timelike curves can exist. So, in a branching universe, could one branch circle around to the mouth of the mother universe, creating a primordial loop? If so, the universe could be its own mother! In any such primordial loop, there would be no no beginning or earliest event, just as there is no clockwise-most position for a clock hand.

  • Specifically: In an adapted rindler vacuum

    In its vanilla form, the Gott-Li model ostensibly violates Hawking's Chronology Protection Conjecture (CPC), which says the laws of physics prevent the formation of closed timelike curves (CTCs). Any particles entering the loop would instantaneously double themselves an infinity of times as they repeatedly keep time traveling back to pile-up and coexist with earlier versions of themselves. The density thereby grows and the resultant gravity would rapidly warp space so as to destroy the necessary wormhole structure. So Gott and Li themselves admit they require few things for their loop.1

    1) It needs a Cauchy Horizon bounding it off from the rest of space-time

    One thing their model needs is a Cauchy horizon (which is required for CTCs in general)—a boundary separating two regions where no physical interactions between the regions can occur.2

    2) It needs an “adapted” Rindler Vacuum

    To avoid implosion, Gott and Li also need their very special “adapted Rinder vacuum” with a zero-temperature empty space.3 This state must be a zero-temperature state (to avoid thermal fluctuations), a conformally coupled scalar field (so the stress-energy tensor can be made to vanish throughout Misner space except on the Cauchy horizon), and ensure the absence of real particles or radiation (to prevent energy accumulation that could destabilize the closed timelike curves).

    1. Here is a thought experiment illustrating the challenge:

      Kip Thorne: Imagine that Carole is zooming back to Earth with one wormhole mouth in her spacecraft, and I am sitting at home on Earth with the other. When the spacecraft gets to within 10 lightyears of Earth, it suddenly becomes possible for radiation (electromagnetic waves) to use the wormhole for time travel: any random bit of radiation that leaves our home in Pasadena traveling at the speed of light toward the spacecraft can arrive at the spacecraft after 10 years’ time (as seen on Earth), enter the wormhole mouth there, travel back in time by 10 years (as seen on Earth), and emerge from the mouth on Earth at precisely the same moment as it started its trip. The radiation piles right on top of its previous self, not just in space but in spacetime, doubling its strength. What’s more, during the trip each quantum of radiation (each photon) got boosted in energy due to the relative motion of the wormhole mouths (a “Doppler-shift” boost). After the radiation’s next trip out to the spacecraft then back through the wormhole, it again returns at the same time as it left and again piles up on itself, again with a Dopplerboosted energy. Again and again this happens, making the beam of radiation infinitely strong. In this way, beginning with an arbitrarily tiny amount of radiation, a beam of infinite energy is created, coursing through space between the two wormhole mouths. As the beam passes through the wormhole . . . it will produce infinite spacetime curvature [i.e. a singularity] and probably destroy the wormhole, thereby preventing [a time machine from coming into being in the first place]. [1994, pp. 505–6.]
    2. The interactions are prevented because of the the finite velocity at which physical interactions can propagate in space-time. It is naturally produced in any inflationary baby universe that tunnels across the Einstein-Rosen bridge; it would need to separate the CTC-allowing region from the rest of spacetime. (Gott, J. Richard (2001). Time Travel in Einstein’s Universe: The Physical Possibilities of Travel Through Time [Houghton Mifflin], 117.)
    3. The "adapted Rindler vacuum" is a modified vacuum state specifically tailored to the unique conditions of Misner space, ensuring that the renormalized stress-energy tensor remains zero throughout the space except on the Cauchy horizon.
  • Cosmologists find it implausible

    William Lane Craig & James Sinclair: “CTC [closed time-like curve (I.e. Time-machine)] physics is interesting, and while some theorists still pursue it, it occupies only a small minority of ongoing cosmological investigation. While it is true that no one has been able definitively to rule out CTCs, the evidentiary burden lies upon those defending the viability of such space-times and models predicated upon their reality.” [The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology (), 136]

“Yes, after all…
  • The "adapted" vacuum is infinitely improbable

    After the publication of Gott and Li’s paper, William Hiscock developed a defense of the CPC that still appears to stand (Hiscock 2000). First, Hiscock argues that the Gott–Li choice of initial conditions is highly fine-tuned. In fact, Gott–Li’s vacuum is of “measure zero” in the set of all possible Rindler vacuums. This means that the scenario is just about as unlikely as is possible without ruling it out summarily. D. H. Coule agrees in his summary of quantum gravity models, referring to the Gott–Li model as “rather contrived” (Coule 2005). 31

    But, plausibly...

    • The universe formed in an "adapted Rinder vacuum" (Response: But that "adapted" version is infinitely improbable at best3, and likely physically impossible given more realistic forces,4
    • especially Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle which essentially guarantees the necessary conditions fail5)
  • ARVs for conformally invariant non-interacting fields are unrealistic

    Most fields in nature are neither perfectly conformally invariant nor entirely non-interacting. They realistically always have some level of interaction, either with themselves (self-interactions) or with other fields.1 This is relevant because the necessary ARV state fails absent this unrealistic field.2

    1. In a nutshell, if this particular field interacted with other fields or itself:
      William A. Hiscock: “the gravitational backreaction to such a diverging stress-energy would alter the spacetime in such a way as to prevent the formation of CTCs.” [“Quantized fields and the Chronology Protection,” https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0009061.]

      To elaborate, “conformally invariant” fields are those that remain unchanged under conformal transformations (changes in the metric that preserve angles but not necessarily distances). “Non-interacting fields” are those that do not engage in self-interactions or interactions with other fields. And in the context of quantum fields and general relativity, the “stress-energy tensor” describes the density and flux of energy and momentum in spacetime. If this tensor “diverges,” it means that the energy density and pressure become infinitely large at certain points. When quantized fields, such as scalar fields, are present in a spacetime with CTCs, the stress-energy tensor can become infinitely large (diverge) at certain points, particularly on the chronology horizon. When radiation (such as electromagnetic waves) enters a time machine or a region with CTCs, it can travel back in time and re-enter the same region. This process repeats, causing the radiation to overlap with itself and exponentially increase in energy density. Each pass through the CTC amplifies the radiation, leading to a beam of infinite energy. The intense energy density created by this radiation pile-up increases the gravitational field, and according to general relativity, this increased energy density warps spacetime more and more severely. This so-called “gravitational backreaction” ultimately alters the structure of spacetime enough to create singularities or other distortions that prevent the maintenance of CTCs.

    2. Hiscock has shown that the necessary adapted Rindler vacuum state fails for non-conformally coupled files that are even just self-interacting. The vacuum stress-energy tensor for these fields always diverges on the chronology horizons in Misner space. This divergence occurs regardless of the particular value of the Misner identification scale. Therefore, the stability seen in the adapted Rindler vacuum is limited to a very narrow set of conditions, genuinely requiring conformally invariant, non-interacting fields.
  • quantum indeterminacy

    1. And its also physically impossible in virtue of quantum indeterminacy:
      Coule:““. . . in Misner space this state [Gott–Li model] was only possible with identification scale b = 2p, or b = 2pr0 for the multiple de Sitter case. Such an exact value is itself inconsistent with notions of quantum uncertainty” [2005, p. 31]