A live map of reasons and replies
Was Jesus's body laid in a tomb (after crucifixion)?
Trace the strongest lines of support, challenge each claim, and follow every response as far as the reasoning goes.
supporting
challenging
Before you begin
Orient yourself to the question
01 The question
Jesus existed, and in c. AD 30 Jerusalem he was crucified.1 In being taken down from the cross, was Jesus’s body at least put in a tomb? We are leaving open the question of whether or not Jesus was actually dead, and the question of whether or not this was actually a burial. Competing views suggest Jesus's body was instead thrown in a shallow trench grave—perhaps eaten by dogs, or maybe thrown in a communal pit.
Sources and notes
- For example, Acts reports Jesus's by crucifixion (Acts 2:23; 2:36; 4:10; 5:30; 10:39) in Jerusalem (Acts 13:27; cf. 10:39).
02 Historians say “Yes”
- Gary Habermas (NT Scholar at Liberty): “Certainly the majority of scholars think that Jesus’ body was placed in a tomb.” [“The Late Twentieth-Century Resurgence of Naturalistic Responses to Jesus' Resurrection” in Trinity Journal 22NS (2001): 179-196.]
- Bart Ehrman ([Opposes Christianity] NT & Religion professor at UNC: “I think we can say that after Jesus’ death, with some (probably with some) certainty, that he was buried, possibly by this fellow, Joseph of Arimathea, and that three days later he appeared not to have been in his tomb” [Lecture 4: “Oral and Written Traditions about Jesus” in From Jesus to Constantine: A History of Early Christianity (The Teaching Company, 2003).]
The argument field
Follow a claim. Test its reply.
Open any reason to read its case. Linked claims take you deeper into the tree.
For
Supports this claim
-
The local Christians said “yes” from the getgo
01 Supporting reason The local Christians said “yes” from the getgo Read argument
In c. AD 30, The Jerusalem Church's official position was, “Yes, Jesus's body was placed in a tomb.”
We know this because several early sources converge on the same news.
- The church agreed with Peter, and Peter was saying the body was entombed.
- The old burial report in the Gospel of Mark anticipates an undoing of that burial.
- Acts 13:29 originated honestly (see below).
- Jews presumed an empty tomb in their polemics (see below)
Given that the church was in a position to know the truth of the matter, their positive belief counts in favor of Jesus's body actually being laid in a tomb.
Sources and notes
- The church would not likely have accepted a report like this without evidence. [Forthcoming]
- There are three reasons to think the church had not simply fallen for a lie: First, there are no plausible candidates in general who would form such a lie. Second, there are no plausible candidates who the Jerusalem church would trust that would form such a lie. Third, the Jerusalem church learned the truth in a confidence-inspiring way (eyewitness testimony). Details on all this is forthcoming.
- There are three reasons to think this church was not lying for apologetics: First, The early church did not care much for empty tomb apologetics Second, The early church did not use empty tomb apologetics. Third, the report was successfully circulating in the church. This is relevant because, in c. AD 30 Jerusalem, the success of any “Jesus's body was placed in a tomb” report from the Jerusalem church depended on x's approval.
-
The local Jews said “yes” from the getgo
02 Supporting reason The local Jews said “yes” from the getgo Read argument
In AD 30, the public stance of the Jerusalem Jews was that “Yes, Jesus's body is gone from its tomb” (crying “theft!”).
-
Joseph entombed Jesus
03 Supporting reason Joseph entombed Jesus Read argument
Specifically, the Sanhedrin member Joseph of Arimatha placed Jesus's body in a tomb.
A full case is forthcoming. It focuses on how embarrassing this was to the early church and the unlikelihood of their inventing it.
This is relevant, of coure, because it entails that Jesus was placed in tomb.
-
Acts 13:29 says so
04 Supporting reason Acts 13:29 says so Read argument
Acts 13:29 -- [t]hey took Him down from the cross and laid Him in a tomb.
Sources and notes
- It seems unlikely that the empty tomb report in Acts is unjustified. After all,
• Hans Conzelmann: “...the form here is kerygmatic, not narrative.” [Acts of the Apostles, trans. by Limburg et. al., Ed. by Epp, Matthews (Fortress, 1963, 1987), 105.] That is to say, it was part of the original kernal preaching.
• Gary Habermas: “What may be another early creed (Acts 13:29-31, 36-37) even more clearly indicates that Jesus was buried in a tomb,” [“The Case for Christ's Resurrection” in To Everyone an Answer (IVP, 2004), 189.]
Against