A live map of reasons and replies

Would reputed demoniacs considered unreliable witnesses?

Trace the strongest lines of support, challenge each claim, and follow every response as far as the reasoning goes.

02 Reasons
supporting
00 Reasons
challenging

Before you begin

Orient yourself to the question

01 Our question

Some persons are thought to be possessed by demons. During Biblical times, in Mediterranean society, was their a bias against the testimony of such demoniac’s (or former demoniac’s), such that they held relatively little persuasive value for typical audiences? Was there a general reluctance to regard them as credible witnesses? In reporting events, was their voice largely considered suspect?

02 Historians
  • Dale Allison: “From ancient to modern times, critics of Christianity have remarked upon the dubious nature of testimony from a former demoniac.” [Resurrecting Jesus (T&T Clark, 2005), 251.]

The argument field

Follow a claim. Test its reply.

Open any reason to read its case. Linked claims take you deeper into the tree.

2 arguments at this level

For

Supports this claim

2 reasons
  1. Demoniacs would be judged crazy

    01 Supporting reason Demoniacs would be judged crazy Read argument

    Those judged to have been Demoniacs will have also been judged to be mentally ill and subject to paranoia. This is reason to think demoniacs were considered unreliable witnesses because...

    • Richard Swinburne: “[It could] make them particularly ill suited as witnesses, being as open to the charge of being still under the influence of these spirits, or (by the more secularly minded) of being liable to fantasize.” [The Resurrection of God Incarnate, (Clarendon, 2003), 151.]
  2. For example: Mary was

    02 Supporting reason For example: Mary was Read argument

    As an example, Mary Magdalene was dismissed as an unreliable source in virtue of her reputation as a former demoniac. (E.g. Celsus derides Christianity’s origin story because she was a Demoniac who sourced the originating belief.)

    Sources and notes
    1. At least one skeptic has suggested this (Peter Kirby says Luke’s words “may not have been known to the author of John…”). But Christians were quite unified in their beliefs, in part because they were so well-networked. It truly is reported in Lk 8:2 (“Mary who was called Magdalene, from whom seven demons had gone out”) and is quite memorable. It is also found in Ps. Mk 16:9 — “He first appeared to Mary Magdalene, from whom He had cast out seven demons.”

Against

Challenges this claim

0 reasons