Paul believed that the light he saw on the road to Damascus was heavenly glory, some or all of which was emanating from Jesus’s glorified body (even if emanated too blindingly for Paul to make out the figure it was emanating from).
A forthcoming article will analyzes at least these 4 evidences:
• OT often says heavenly figures are beings of light.1
• Phil 3:21 — “I [Paul] want a Jesus-like ‘body of glory.’”
• Paul associated light with bodily glory (e.g. 1 Cor 15). 2 • In Acts, Paul sees the glory of Jesus’ body.
This is relevant because, it entails he almost certainly did not believe Jesus was composed of amorphous light during this appearance since all sources are clear that Paul thought he saw Jesus himself.3
The book of Acts is very explicit in communicating that Jesus’ resurrection involved a raising of the same body he died in.
This full article analyzes these 5 evidences:
• That’s what “resurrection” meant.
• Acts 2 (“buried… raised up… [no] decay”).
• Acts 10 (“raised.. witnesses… ate & drank”).
• Acts 13 (“buried… raised… [no] decay”).
• Acts agrees with Paul.
This is relevant because this material is very old/reliable, and it entails that Paul saw Jesus himself (not just some remote light/voice miraculously created by Jesus).
The account of Paul’s life in the book of Acts comports well with the picture given by Paul’s own writings.
A forthcoming analyzes at least these 12 evidences:
• Acts says Paul sees his calling via Jer 1 and Isa 49.
• Acts says Paul had impeccable Jewish credentials.
• Acts says Paul was a persecutor of the church.
• Acts says Paul converted in way xyz around Damascus.
• Acts says Paul supported himself by labor.
• Acts says Paul works to support himself (so-as not to burden converts).
• Acts says Paul goes first to Jews, then Gentiles.
• Acts says adapts well to diff audiences (e.g. Jew/Gentile).
• Acts articulates a salvation history.
• Acts says Paul visits local synagogues first.
• Acts sermons match Paul.
This is relevant because Paul says he saw Jesus himself—not just a shapeless unsourced light.
During the alleged appearance of Jesus to Paul, Acts explicitly refers to dazzling light and yet makes no mention of Jesus’ body.
Here are the relevant porions of the 3 accounts given:
• Acts 9:3-4 — “light from heaven flashed around him.”
• Acts 22:6-8 — “a very bright light.”
• Acts 26:13-15 — “ I saw on the way a light.”
This is relevant because if Acts thought there was a body inside (or sourcing) the light it would’ve said Paul saw it.
But so what?
• Readers knew the background and were expected to know that the light was from a source: Jesus Christ risen (all knew that with a sufficiently bright light you can’t make out the contours of the source—especially if you were blinded by it—but that doesn’t mean there is no source).